Duplication between disparate deduplication systems

ABSTRACT

Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and processes to improve the duplication of data between disparate deduplication systems. Source fingerprints are generated for data blocks using a source fingerprint algorithm at a source deduplication system. The source fingerprints and previously-generated source fingerprints are used to determine whether the data blocks are new or modified. If the data blocks are new or modified, target fingerprints are generated for the data blocks using a target fingerprint algorithm associated with a target deduplication system. The target fingerprints are sent to the target deduplication system.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present patent application is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 15/363,902, filed on Nov. 29, 2016, now U.S. Pat.No. 9,946,486, entitled “DUPLICATION BETWEEN DISPARATE DEDUPLICATIONSYSTEMS” which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety andfor all purposes.

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

This disclosure is related to deduplication backup systems. Inparticular, this disclosure is related to duplication between disparatededuplication systems.

DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

A fingerprinting algorithm is an algorithm that maps a file, datasegments, or other unit of data to a more compact representation (e.g.,resulting in a unique file identifier and/or data segment fingerprints,or the like). A fingerprint uniquely identifies the file and/or thefile's data segments, and is typically used to avoid unnecessarystorage, comparison, or transmission of excessive amounts of data. Forexample, a backup server can check whether a file has been modified byretrieving one or more fingerprint(s) and comparing the retrievedfingerprint(s) with a previously backed-up copy. Therefore,fingerprint(s) may be used for data deduplication.

Different deduplication systems can use different native fingerprintmethodologies or algorithms. For example, a source deduplication systemmight use Message-Digest Algorithm 5 (MD5) fingerprint algorithm,whereas a target deduplication might use Secure Hash Algorithm 256(SHA-256) fingerprint algorithm.

Optimizing the duplication of deduplicated data between suchdeduplication systems requires both deduplication systems to use thesame fingerprint methodology or algorithm. If not, deduplicated datamust be rehydrated using the source fingerprint algorithm, and thenre-deduplicated using the target fingerprint algorithm. Obviously, suchdata migration is resource intensive, cumbersome, and inefficient.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and processes to duplicate databetween disparate deduplication systems. One such method involvesgenerating, at a source deduplication system, source fingerprints fordata blocks using a source fingerprint algorithm, and determiningwhether the data blocks are new or modified using the sourcefingerprint(s) generated for the data block(s) and previously-generatedsource fingerprints.

In this example, if a determination is made that the data blocks, or asubset thereof, are new or modified, the method generates targetfingerprints for these new or modified data blocks using a targetfingerprint algorithm associated with a target deduplication system, andsends the target fingerprint(s) to the target deduplication system.

In one embodiment, the method receives a request from the targetdeduplication system for one or more of the data blocks that are new ormodified. Based on the request, the method sends the one or more of thedata blocks that are new or modified to the target deduplication system.

In some embodiments, the previously-generated source fingerprints aregenerated using the source fingerprint algorithm, and the sourcefingerprint algorithm and the target fingerprint algorithm are differentfrom one another.

In other embodiments, the method determines a reference count of thedata blocks, and sends the reference count of the data blocks to thetarget deduplication system as part of sending the one or more of thedata blocks that are new or modified.

In certain embodiments, the method accesses the target fingerprintalgorithm associated with the target deduplication system from acomputing system communicatively coupled to the source deduplicationsystem, or receives the target fingerprint algorithm associated with thetarget deduplication system from the target deduplication system.

In one embodiment, the data blocks are deduplicated by the sourcededuplication system prior to the generation of the target fingerprintfor one or more of the data blocks.

In certain embodiments, the method determines whether the data blockshave been previously sent to the target deduplication system.

In other embodiments, the method converts or translates the sourcefingerprint for one or more of the data blocks that are new or modifiedto the target fingerprint generated using the target fingerprintalgorithm associated with the target deduplication system.

The foregoing is a summary and thus contains, by necessity,simplifications, generalizations and omissions of detail; consequentlythose skilled in the art will appreciate that the summary isillustrative only and is not intended to be in any limiting. Otheraspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure, as definedsolely by the claims, will become apparent in the non-limiting detaileddescription set forth below.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure may be better understood, and its numerousobjects, features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in theart by referencing the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computing system 100 that performsduplication between disparate deduplication systems, according to oneembodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a computing system 200 that performsduplication between disparate deduplication systems, according to oneembodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a fingerprint translation table 300, according to oneembodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart 400 that illustrates a process for performingduplication between disparate deduplication systems, according to oneembodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart 500 that illustrates a process for sending targetfingerprints from a source deduplication system to a targetdeduplication system, according to one embodiment of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart 600 that illustrates a process for sending afingerprint translation table from a source deduplication system to atarget deduplication system, according to one embodiment of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart 700 that illustrates a process for receivingtarget fingerprints from a source deduplication system at a targetdeduplication system, according to one embodiment of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a computing system 800 that facilitatesshared services between deduplication systems, according to oneembodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a networking system 900, according to oneembodiment of the present disclosure.

While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications andalternative forms, specific embodiments of the disclosure are providedas examples in the drawings and detailed description. It should beunderstood that the drawings and detailed description are not intendedto limit the disclosure to the particular form disclosed. Instead, theintention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternativesfalling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by theappended claims.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Introduction

A fingerprinting algorithm is an algorithm that maps a larger data item(e.g., a computer file, data segment, or other unit of data) to asmaller value. The smaller value is sometimes referred to as the“fingerprint” of the data item. The fingerprint uniquely identifies thedata item. During a backup, clients and/or computing systems canduplicate data within a set of data to be backed up. In addition, if aset of data is backed up multiple times, data that is unchanged orunmodified also results in duplicates of previously backed up data. Inorder to prevent backing up duplicate data from a client or multipleclients, backup systems can implement deduplication, which is a processfor removing duplicate copies of data. Deduplication preserves storagespace when backing up data from client systems. Data deduplicated by asource deduplication system can then be duplicated to a targetdeduplication system for disaster recovery purposes and the like.

Fingerprints may be used for data deduplication purposes, and so avoidthe need for comparison and transmission of excessive amounts of data.For example, backup servers can check whether a file has been modifiedby retrieving only the file's fingerprint (instead of the entire file),and comparing the retrieved fingerprint with that of apreviously-retrieved copy of the file. Thus, matching fingerprints insuch a situation obviates the need to transfer the files. A fingerprintcan also be a value generated for a given data segment. Typically, suchfingerprint values are unique to each data segment, and thus distinguishdata segments from one another. An example implementation of afingerprint is a hash value. For example, hashing algorithms (alsocalled fingerprinting algorithms) such as Rabin's Algorithm,Message-Digest Algorithm 5 (MD5), and Secure Hash Algorithm 512(SHA-512), and the like, can be used to generate hash values.

As previously noted, different deduplication systems may use andimplement different native fingerprint methodologies or algorithms fordata deduplication. For example, a source deduplication system might usethe MD5 fingerprint algorithm, whereas a target deduplication might usethe SHA-256 or the SHA-512 fingerprint algorithm. Duplicatingdeduplicated data between such disparate deduplication systems presentsunique challenges.

Optimized duplication between deduplication systems involves a sourcededuplication system sending a query to a target deduplication system todetermine whether the target deduplication system has data fingerprintedby the source deduplication system. If the target (or destination)deduplication system has the data fingerprinted by the sourcededuplication system, then this data is not transferred (or migrated) bythe source deduplication system during the optimized duplicationprocess. However, this process works only if the source and targetdeduplication systems calculate or determine fingerprint values usingthe same fingerprint algorithm or methodology. If the source and targetdeduplication systems use different fingerprint algorithms ormethodologies, optimized duplication does not work and regular (e.g.,hydrated) duplication must occur.

In addition, requiring the modification of source and/or targetdeduplication systems in order to change the native (e.g., internal)deduplication implementations employed is cumbersome and costineffective, particularly if more than one such change becomesnecessary. Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and processes toperform duplication between disparate deduplication systems withoutrequiring such deduplication systems to change their own native(internal) deduplication implementations.

Example Computing Systems to Duplicate Data Between DisparateDeduplication Systems

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computing system 100 that can beconfigured to perform duplication or data migration between disparatededuplication systems, according to one embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1,clients 105(1)-(N) generate data that is deduplicated by sourcededuplication system 115 implemented in source backup server 110.Clients 105(1)-(N) and source backup server 110 can be any of a varietyof different types of computing devices, including a server, personalcomputing device, laptop computer, cellular phone, or the like. Sourcebackup server 110 is communicatively coupled to target backup server 155via network 185. It will be appreciated that any type of network and/orinterconnection other than network 185 (e.g., the Internet, a Local AreaNetwork (LAN), and the like) can be used to facilitate communicationbetween source deduplication system 115 and target deduplication system160.

As shown in FIG. 1, source deduplication system 115 includes a datablock analyzer 120 and a source fingerprint generator 125. Data blockanalyzer 120 analyzes data received from clients 105(1)-(N) (e.g., inthe form of data segments or data blocks). For example, data blockanalyzer 120 can determine whether certain data blocks, data segments,or other units of data received from clients 105(1)-(N) are new ormodified.

Source fingerprint generator 125 further implements a source fingerprintalgorithm 130 and uses a target fingerprint algorithm 135. In thisexample, source fingerprint algorithm 130 is a native (or internal)fingerprint algorithm or methodology implemented by source deduplicationsystem 115. In some embodiments, source fingerprint generator 125 canuse more than one (non-native) target fingerprint algorithm (e.g.,target fingerprint algorithms or methodologies associated with variousdifferent target deduplication systems).

Source deduplication system 115 is communicatively coupled to a sourcebackup device 140. Source backup device 140 stores data backed up anddeduplicated by source deduplication system 115 in the form of a sourcebackup image 145. Source backup device 140 also includes source backupmetadata 150. Source backup metadata 150 contains information regardingdata in source backup image 145 (e.g., the association between datablocks in source backup image 145 and one or more data objects such asfiles, and the like). Similarly, target deduplication system 160 iscommunicatively coupled to a target backup device 170. Target backupdevice 170 stores data duplicated by source deduplication system 115 totarget deduplication system 160 in the form of a target backup image175. Target backup device 170 also includes target backup metadata 180.Target backup metadata 180 contains information regarding data in targetbackup image 175.

It will be appreciated that source backup device 140 and target backupdevice 170 can include one or more of a variety of different storagedevices, including hard disks, compact discs, digital versatile discs,one or more solid state drives (SSDs) memory such as Flash memory, andthe like, or one or more logical storage devices such as volumesimplemented on one or more such physical storage devices.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a computing system 200 that performsduplication between disparate deduplication systems, according to oneembodiment. As shown in FIG. 2, in addition to data block analyzer 120and source fingerprint generator 125, source deduplication system 115also implements and includes a fingerprint translation table 205, asource reference generator 210, and a source fingerprint database 215.In addition, source backup device 140 stores multiple source backupimages 145(1)-(N), as well as a source catalog 220.

Source fingerprint generator 125 generates source fingerprints for datablocks received from clients 105(1)-(N) using source fingerprintalgorithm 130 and stores these source fingerprints in source fingerprintdatabase 215. As noted, source fingerprint algorithm 130 is a native orinternal fingerprint algorithm implemented by source deduplicationsystem 115 and is used to deduplicate data received from clients105(1)-(N).

Source deduplication system 115 can receive target fingerprint algorithm135 (or an identifier thereof) from target deduplication system 160, orcan access target fingerprint algorithm 135 from some other computingsystem, database, storage device, and the like, that is part of network190 (possibly using such an identifier). Target fingerprint algorithm135 is a native or internal fingerprint algorithm implemented by targetdeduplication system 160 and is different than source fingerprintalgorithm 130. Therefore, target fingerprint algorithm 135 can beconsidered non-native to source deduplication system 160 and thus,cannot be used by source deduplication system 160 to deduplicate datareceived from clients 105(1)-(N).

Also as shown in FIG. 2, and in addition to target fingerprint generator165, target deduplication system 160 includes a fingerprint receiver225, a target reference generator 230, and a target fingerprint database235. Fingerprint receiver 225 receives target fingerprints generated onthe fly by source fingerprint generator 125 using target fingerprintalgorithm 135, and determines whether those (received) targetfingerprints are present in target fingerprint database 235. Inaddition, target backup device 170 stores multiple target backup images175(1)-(N), as well as a target catalog 240. Target backup images175(1)-(N) contain data duplicated to target deduplication 160 by sourcededuplication system 115.

In one embodiment, source fingerprint generator 125 generates sourcefingerprints at source deduplication system 115 for data blocks (e.g.,received from clients 105(1)-(N)) using source fingerprint algorithm130. Data block analyzer 120 then determines whether the data blocks arenew or modified, using the source fingerprints generated for the datablocks and previously-generated source fingerprints. For example, datablock analyzer 120 can compare the source fingerprint generated for eachdata block (e.g., by source fingerprint generator 125 using sourcefingerprint algorithm 130) with previously-generated source fingerprints(e.g., also generated using source fingerprint algorithm 130) in sourcefingerprint database 215 to determine whether one or more of the newlygenerated source fingerprints match previously-generated fingerprints insource fingerprint database 215. In this manner, data block analyzer 120can determine whether a given data block is new or modified (obviously,the opposite could be determined, in the alternative, such that adetermination as to whether or not a data block were existing andunchanged could be made).

In some embodiments, if a determination is made that a given data blockis new or modified (e.g., the source fingerprint generated for the datablock using source fingerprint algorithm 130 does not matchpreviously-generated fingerprints in source fingerprint database 215),source fingerprint generator generates a target fingerprint for the datablock using target fingerprint algorithm 135. In some examples, sourcefingerprint generator 210 then sends the target fingerprint for the datablock directly to target deduplication system 160. In other examples,source fingerprint generator 210 creates and populates fingerprinttranslation table 205 with the target fingerprint, and sends fingerprinttranslation table 205 to target deduplication system 160. In certainembodiments, fingerprint receiver 225 receives one or more targetfingerprints generated by source fingerprint generator 125 using targetfingerprint algorithm 135. Fingerprint receiver 225 then determineswhether the (received) target fingerprints (e.g., for one or more new ormodified data blocks) are part of target fingerprint database 235. Ifthe target fingerprint(s) received from source deduplication 115 are notpart of target fingerprint database 235, target deduplication system 160sends a request to source deduplication system 115 for data block(s)associated with those target fingerprint(s) that are not part of targetfingerprint database 235. Such a request can be sent by targetdeduplication system 160 in various manners.

In one example, target deduplication system 160 can simply return thetarget fingerprint(s) sent by source deduplication system 115 to sourcededuplication system 115 if those target fingerprint(s) are not part oftarget fingerprint database 235. In this case, source deduplication 115can identify and send the data block(s) that correspond to the targetfingerprint(s) sent back by target deduplication system 160. In anotherexample, target deduplication system 160 can identify the data blockthat corresponds to a particular target fingerprint and request thatdata block from source deduplication system 115.

Therefore, based on target fingerprint(s) generated by sourcededuplication system 115 using target fingerprint algorithm 135, andsent to target deduplication system 160 by source deduplication system115, source deduplication system 115 receives a request from targetdeduplication system 160 for one or more data blocks that are new ormodified. Based on this request, source deduplication system 115 sendsthose requested data blocks (e.g., that are new or modified) to targetdeduplication system 160.

In some embodiments, data block analyzer 120 can determine that certaindata blocks are not new or modified (i.e., existing and unchanged). Forexample, a source fingerprint calculated for a data block by sourcefingerprint generator 125 using source fingerprint algorithm 130 can bepresent in source fingerprint database 215. In such circumstances,source reference generator 210 simply increments the reference count ofthe data block and updates source catalog 220 (e.g., to indicate thatthe data block is not new or modified, but has been accessed again).However, because this data block is not new or modified, there is noneed to duplicate this data block to target deduplication system 160. Insuch cases, source deduplication system 115 simply sends the (updated)reference count of the data block to target deduplication system 160(e.g., to update target catalog 240) as part of sending one or more datablocks that are new or modified.

Therefore, source deduplication system 115 converts or translates thesource fingerprint for one or more of the data blocks that are new ormodified to the target fingerprint generated using target fingerprintalgorithm 135 associated with the target deduplication system 160, andperforms duplication without requiring target deduplication system 160to change its own deduplication fingerprint methodology.

Examples of Performing on the Fly Translation of Fingerprints forDuplication

FIG. 3 is an example table 300, according to one embodiment. Fingerprinttranslation table 205 includes a client field 305, a file field 310, adata block field 315, a reference count field 320, a source fingerprintfield 325, a target fingerprint field 330, and a duplicate field 335. Incertain embodiments, fingerprint translation table 205 can be used bysource deduplication system 115 to duplicate data to targetdeduplication system 160.

For example, client 105(1) can generate a data block A that is part offile Project 1 with a reference count of 2. Source fingerprint generator125 first generates a source fingerprint for data block A using sourcefingerprint algorithm 130 (e.g., sdfg7890). If the source fingerprintfor data block A is not present in source fingerprint database 215,source fingerprint generator 125 generates a target fingerprint for datablock A on the fly using target fingerprint algorithm 135 (e.g.,asdf1234). Source deduplication system 115 then sends fingerprinttranslation table 205 to target deduplication system 160 or, in certainembodiments, just sends the target fingerprint (e.g., asdf1234) totarget fingerprint receiver 225 to “check” whether target deduplicationsystem 160 has a target fingerprint in target fingerprint database 235that matches asdf1234 (e.g., because data block A has a reference countof 2—indicating that data block A has been previously accessed, andtherefore, may not be new to target deduplication system 160). Aspreviously noted, source deduplication system 115 either receives arequest for a data block that corresponds to asdf1234 from targetdeduplication system 160, or in certain embodiments, receives theactual/sent target fingerprint (e.g., asdf1234) back from targetdeduplication system 160. Source deduplication system 115 then sends ortransfers data block A to target deduplication 160.

In some embodiments, it will be appreciated that fingerprint translationtable 205 can be useful to keep track of data blocks that are new, thuspermitting source deduplication system 115 to duplicate such a datablock to target deduplication system 160 without requiring targetdeduplication system 160 to check whether the target fingerprint for thedata block exists in target fingerprint database 235. One such exampleis provided with reference to data block M shown in fingerprinttranslation table 205.

Client 105(1) can generate a data block M that is part of a file Project1 and has a reference count of 1. Source fingerprint generator 125 firstgenerates a source fingerprint for data block M using source fingerprintalgorithm 130 (e.g., ghjk1234). If the source fingerprint for data blockM is not present in source fingerprint database 215, source fingerprintgenerator 125 generates a target fingerprint for data block M on the flyusing target fingerprint algorithm 135 (e.g., wert5678). Sourcededuplication system 115 then updates fingerprint translation table 205(e.g., duplicate field 335) to indicate that because data block M is newto source deduplication system 115, data block M is has also not beenlikely duplicated to target deduplication system 160. In this case,there is no need for target deduplication system 160 to check whetherthe target fingerprint for data block M (e.g., wert5678) is present intarget fingerprint database 235. Data block M can be duplicated totarget deduplication system 160 next time source deduplication system115 performs a deduplication operation. In addition, because the targetfingerprint for data block M has already been calculated by sourcededuplication system 115, target deduplication system 160 does not needto separately calculate the target fingerprint for data block M, thussaving valuable computing resources during duplication operationsbetween disparate deduplication systems.

As previously noted, in addition to sending new or modified data blocksto target deduplication system 160 as part of deduplication operations,source deduplication system 115 can also send instructions to targetdeduplication system 160 to update the reference counts of particulardata blocks that are not new or modified (e.g., for data blockscontaining data that has already been encountered, and so for which afingerprint already exists). One such example is provided with referenceto data block B shown in fingerprint translation table 205. As shown infingerprint translation table 205, data block B is part of file Project2. Initially, data block B has a reference count of 1 and is duplicatedto target deduplication system 160 based on target fingerprint zxcv3456.However, if source deduplication system 115 analyzes data block B asecond time and data block B is not modified, source deduplicationsystem 115 simply increments the reference count of data block B to 2and instructs target deduplication system 160 to do the same. Aspreviously noted, this update to the reference count of data block B canbe sent to target deduplication system 160 as part of sending new ormodified data blocks.

Therefore, in this manner, fingerprint translation table 205 can be usedby source deduplication system 115 to perform on the fly fingerprinttranslation or conversion between source and target fingerprints for agiven data block or data segment. Among various other functions, on thefly translation or conversion of source fingerprints into targetfingerprints for data blocks as shown in fingerprint translation table205 can be used to: (1) check whether a data block has been previouslysent to target deduplication system 160 as part of a previousduplication operation either by source deduplication system 115 or bysome other computing system, (2) send new or modified blocks to targetdeduplication system 160 by pre-calculating the new or modified datablocks' target fingerprints, and (3) update reference counts, targetbackup metadata 180 and target catalog 240 as part of performingduplication operations (e.g., so that data can be rehydrated efficientlyby target deduplication system 160).

Example Processes to Duplicate Data Between Disparate DeduplicationSystems

FIG. 4 is a flowchart 400 that illustrates a process for performingduplication between disparate deduplication systems, according to oneembodiment. The process begins at 410 by generating sourcefingerprint(s) for data block(s) (e.g., data blocks received andanalyzed by data block analyzer 120). At 420, the process determineswhether the data block(s) are new or modified, or whether the sourcefingerprint(s) calculated for the data block(s) (e.g., using sourcefingerprint algorithm 130) do not match existing source fingerprints(e.g., previously-generated source fingerprints in source fingerprintdatabase 215).

If the data block(s) are not new or modified, or the sourcefingerprint(s) calculated for the data block(s) match existing sourcefingerprints, the process ends (e.g., source deduplication system 160simply increments the reference count of the data block(s) and updatessource catalog 220). Otherwise, the process proceeds to 430 where targetfingerprint(s) for the data block(s) are generated (e.g., using targetfingerprint algorithm 135). At 440, the process sends the targetfingerprint(s) to target deduplication system 440. As previously noted,the target fingerprint(s) can be sent to fingerprint receiver 225directly (e.g., target fingerprints asdf1234, wert5678, and the like),or as part of fingerprint translation table 205, as shown in FIG. 3.

At 450, the process receives a request for one or more data blocks. Aspreviously noted, source deduplication system 115 can receive one ormore target fingerprint(s) sent to target deduplication system 160 backfrom target deduplication system 160, or source deduplication system 115can receive a request for particular data blocks associated withparticular target fingerprints. For example, if source deduplicationsystem 115 sends 10 target fingerprints to target deduplication system160, source deduplication system 115 can receive a request for datablock(s) associated with target fingerprints 2, 5, and 8 (out of the 10sent to target deduplication system 160) from target deduplicationsystem 160. Regardless of which method is used, source deduplicationsystem 115 can identify the data block(s) associated with the targetfingerprint(s) that are not part of target fingerprint database 235(e.g., as determined by target deduplication system 160).

At 460, the process sends (e.g., transmits or copies) the requested datablock(s) to target deduplication system 160. At 470, the processdetermines whether there are additional data block(s) to process. Ifthere are more data blocks to process, the process loops back to 410.Otherwise, the process ends.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart 500 that illustrates a process for sending targetfingerprints from a source deduplication system to a targetdeduplication system, according to one embodiment. The process begins at510 by receiving data block(s) (e.g., from clients 105(1)-(N)). At 520,the process generates source fingerprints(s) for the data block(s) usingsource fingerprint algorithm 130. In this example, source fingerprintalgorithm 130 is a native or internal fingerprint algorithm of sourcededuplication system 115 and is used by source deduplication system 115to perform data deduplication operations.

At 530, the process identifies new or modified data block(s) using thesource fingerprint(s) (e.g., by comparing source fingerprint(s) topreviously-generated source fingerprint(s) in source fingerprintdatabase 215 to determine if there is a match). At 540, the processgenerates target fingerprint(s) for new or modified data block(s) usingtarget fingerprint algorithm 135 (e.g., a non-native and differentfingerprint algorithm).

At 550, the process sends the target fingerprint(s) of new or modifiedblocks to target deduplication system 160 (e.g., either on their own oras part of fingerprint translation table 205). At 560, the processreceives a request for one or more new or modified data blocks fromtarget deduplication system 160. The process receives such a requestonly if target deduplication system 160 determines that the one or morenew or modified data blocks are not present in target fingerprintdatabase 235. If the one or more new or modified data blocks weredetermined by target deduplication system 160 to be present in targetfingerprint database 235, then such a request would simply requestmetadata associated with those one or more data blocks (e.g., (updated)reference counts, and the like) from source deduplication system 115(e.g., so that target deduplication system 160 can update target catalog240 with the latest information about the one or more data blocks forefficient rehydration of data).

At 570, the process sends the requested new or modified data block(s) totarget deduplication system 160. As previously noted, the request fromtarget deduplication 160 can simply include a list of previously-senttarget fingerprints that are not present in target fingerprint database235. Alternatively, the request can identify and request data block(s)associated with a subset of target fingerprint(s) of targetfingerprint(s) sent to target deduplication system 160 by sourcededuplication system 115). At 580, the process determines whether thereare more data block(s) to process. If there are more data blocks toprocess, the process loops back to 510. Otherwise, the process ends.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart 600 that illustrates a process for sending afingerprint translation table from a source deduplication system to atarget deduplication system, according to one embodiment. The processbegins at 610 by receiving data blocks from clients (e.g., clients105(1)-(N)). At 620, the process generates source fingerprint(s) for thedata block(s). At 630, the process determines whether the data block(s)are new or modified, or whether the source fingerprint(s) calculated forthe data block(s) (e.g., using source fingerprint algorithm 130) matchesexisting source fingerprints (e.g., previously-generated sourcefingerprints in source fingerprint database 215).

If the data block(s) are not new or modified, or the sourcefingerprint(s) calculated for the data block(s) match existing sourcefingerprints, the process ends (e.g., source deduplication system 160simply increments the reference count of the data block(s) and updatessource catalog 220). However, if the data block(s) are new or modified,or the source fingerprint(s) calculated for the data block(s) do notmatch existing source fingerprints, the process, at 640, accesses orreceives target fingerprint algorithm 135 (e.g., from targetdeduplication system 160 or some other computing system communicativelycoupled to network 185).

At 650, the process generates target fingerprint(s) for data block(s) isthey are new or modified, or if the data block(s) do not match existingsource fingerprint(s). At 660, the process populates fingerprinttranslation table 205 with target fingerprint(s) (e.g., as shown in FIG.3). At 670, the process sends fingerprint translation table 205 totarget deduplication system 160. At 680, the process determines whetherthere are more data block(s) to process. If there are more data blocksto process, the process loops back to 610. Otherwise, the process ends.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart 700 that illustrates a process for receivingtarget fingerprints from a source deduplication system at a targetdeduplication system, according to one embodiment. The process begins at710 by receiving target fingerprint(s) from source deduplication system115 (e.g., on their own or as part of fingerprint translation table205). At 720, the process identifies received target fingerprint(s) notin target fingerprint database 235. At 730, the process requests datablock(s) corresponding to received target fingerprint(s) not in targetfingerprint database 235 from source deduplication system 160 (e.g., bysending back target fingerprint(s) not in target fingerprint database235 to source deduplication system 160).

At 740, the process receives the requested data block(s) from sourcededuplication system 115. At 750, the process stores the data block(s)received from source deduplication system 115 (e.g., on target backupdevice 170), and at 760, updates target catalog 240. At 770, the processdetermines whether there are more target fingerprint(s) received fromsource deduplication system 115. If there are more target fingerprint(s)received, the process loops back to 710. Otherwise, the process ends.

Example Computing System

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a computing system 800 that facilitatesduplication and/or data migration between disparate deduplicationsystems, according to one embodiment. Computing system 800 broadlyrepresents any single or multi-processor computing device or systemcapable of executing computer-readable instructions. Examples ofcomputing system 800 include, without limitation, any one or more of avariety of devices including workstations, personal computers, laptops,client-side terminals, servers, distributed computing systems, handhelddevices (e.g., personal digital assistants and mobile phones), networkappliances, storage controllers (e.g., array controllers, tape drivecontroller, or hard drive controller), and the like. In its most basicconfiguration, computing system 800 may include at least one processor855 and a memory 860. By executing the software that implements sourcededuplication system 115 and/or target deduplication system 160,computing system 800 becomes a special purpose computing device that isconfigured to duplicate data between disparate deduplication systems.

Processor 855 generally represents any type or form of processing unitcapable of processing data or interpreting and executing instructions.In certain embodiments, processor 855 may receive instructions from asoftware application or module. These instructions may cause processor855 to perform the functions of one or more of the embodiments describedand/or illustrated herein. For example, processor 855 may perform and/orbe a means for performing all or some of the operations describedherein. Processor 855 may also perform and/or be a means for performingany other operations, methods, or processes described and/or illustratedherein.

Memory 860 generally represents any type or form of volatile ornon-volatile storage devices or mediums capable of storing data and/orother computer-readable instructions. Examples include, withoutlimitation, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), flashmemory, or any other suitable memory device. Although not required, incertain embodiments computing system 800 may include both a volatilememory unit and a non-volatile storage device. In one example, programinstructions implementing a source fingerprint generator 125 and/or afingerprint translation table 205 may be loaded into memory 860.

In certain embodiments, computing system 800 may also include one ormore components or elements in addition to processor 855 and/or memory860. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 8, computing system 800 mayinclude a memory controller 820, an Input/Output (I/O) controller 835,and a communication interface 845, each of which may be interconnectedvia a communication infrastructure 805. Communication infrastructure 805generally represents any type or form of infrastructure capable offacilitating communication between one or more components of a computingdevice. Examples of communication infrastructure 805 include, withoutlimitation, a communication bus (such as an Industry StandardArchitecture (ISA), Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI), PCI express(PCIe), or similar bus) and a network.

Memory controller 820 generally represents any type/form of devicecapable of handling memory or data or controlling communication betweenone or more components of computing system 800. In certain embodimentsmemory controller 820 may control communication between processor 855,memory 860, and I/O controller 835 via communication infrastructure 805.In certain embodiments, memory controller 820 may perform and/or be ameans for performing, either alone or in combination with otherelements, one or more of the operations or features described and/orillustrated herein.

I/O controller 835 generally represents any type or form of modulecapable of coordinating and/or controlling the input and outputfunctions of a virtualization server and/or a computing device. Forexample, in certain embodiments I/O controller 835 may control orfacilitate transfer of data between one or more elements of computingsystem 800, such as processor 855, memory 860, communication interface845, display adapter 815, input interface 825, and storage interface840.

Communication interface 845 broadly represents any type or form ofcommunication device or adapter capable of facilitating communicationbetween computing system 800 and one or more other devices.Communication interface 845 may facilitate communication betweencomputing system 800 and a private or public network includingadditional computing systems. Examples of communication interface 845include, without limitation, a wired network interface (such as anetwork interface card), a wireless network interface (such as awireless network interface card), a modem, and any other suitableinterface. Communication interface 845 may provide a direct connectionto a remote server via a direct link to a network, such as the Internet,and may also indirectly provide such a connection through, for example,a local area network (e.g., an Ethernet network), a personal areanetwork, a telephone or cable network, a cellular telephone connection,a satellite data connection, or any other suitable connection.

Communication interface 845 may also represent a host adapter configuredto facilitate communication between computing system 800 and one or moreadditional network or storage devices via an external bus orcommunications channel. Examples of host adapters include, SmallComputer System Interface (SCSI) host adapters, Universal Serial Bus(USB) host adapters, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers(IEEE) 1394 host adapters, Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (SATA),Serial Attached SCSI (SAS), and external SATA (eSATA) host adapters,Advanced Technology Attachment (ATA) and Parallel ATA (PATA) hostadapters, Fibre Channel interface adapters, Ethernet adapters, or thelike. Communication interface 845 may also allow computing system 800 toengage in distributed or remote computing (e.g., by receiving/sendinginstructions to/from a remote device for execution).

As illustrated in FIG. 8, computing system 800 may also include at leastone display device 810 coupled to communication infrastructure 805 via adisplay adapter 815. Display device 810 generally represents any type orform of device capable of visually displaying information forwarded bydisplay adapter 815. Similarly, display adapter 815 generally representsany type or form of device configured to forward graphics, text, andother data from communication infrastructure 805 (or from a framebuffer, as known in the art) for display on display device 810.Computing system 800 may also include at least one input device 830coupled to communication infrastructure 805 via an input interface 825.Input device 830 generally represents any type or form of input devicecapable of providing input, either computer or human generated, tocomputing system 800. Examples of input device 830 include a keyboard, apointing device, a speech recognition device, or any other input device.

Computing system 800 may also include storage device 850 coupled tocommunication infrastructure 805 via a storage interface 840. Storagedevice 850 generally represents any type or form of storage devices ormediums capable of storing data and/or other computer-readableinstructions. For example, storage device 850 may include a magneticdisk drive (e.g., a so-called hard drive), a floppy disk drive, amagnetic tape drive, an optical disk drive, a flash drive, or the like.Storage interface 840 generally represents any type or form of interfaceor device for transferring and/or transmitting data between storagedevice 850, and other components of computing system 800. Storage device850 may be configured to read from and/or write to a removable storageunit configured to store computer software, data, or othercomputer-readable information. Examples of suitable removable storageunits include a floppy disk, a magnetic tape, an optical disk, a flashmemory device, or the like. Storage device 850 may also include othersimilar structures or devices for allowing computer software, data, orother computer-readable instructions to be loaded into computing system800. For example, storage device 850 may be configured to read and writesoftware, data, or other computer-readable information. Storage device850 may also be a part of computing system 800 or may be separatedevices accessed through other interface systems.

Many other devices or subsystems may be connected to computing system800. Conversely, all of the components and devices illustrated in FIG. 8need not be present to practice the embodiments described and/orillustrated herein. The devices and subsystems referenced above may alsobe interconnected in different ways from that shown in FIG. 8.

Computing system 800 may also employ any number of software, firmware,and/or hardware configurations. For example, one or more of theembodiments disclosed herein may be encoded as a computer program (alsoreferred to as computer software, software applications,computer-readable instructions, or computer control logic) on acomputer-readable storage medium. Examples of computer-readable storagemedia include magnetic-storage media (e.g., hard disk drives and floppydisks), optical-storage media (e.g., CD- or DVD-ROMs),electronic-storage media (e.g., solid-state drives and flash media), andthe like. Such computer programs can also be transferred to computingsystem 800 for storage in memory via a network such as the Internet orupon a carrier medium.

The computer-readable medium containing the computer program may beloaded into computing system 800. All or a portion of the computerprogram stored on the computer-readable medium may then be stored inmemory 860 and/or various portions of storage device 850. When executedby processor 855, a computer program loaded into computing system 800may cause processor 855 to perform and/or be a means for performing thefunctions of one or more of the embodiments described and/or illustratedherein. Additionally or alternatively, one or more of the embodimentsdescribed and/or illustrated herein may be implemented in firmwareand/or hardware. For example, computing system 800 may be configured asan application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) adapted to implementone or more of the embodiments disclosed herein.

Example Networking System

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a networking system 900, according to oneembodiment. In certain embodiments, network-attached storage (NAS)devices may be configured to communicate with source deduplicationsystems 115(1)-(N) and/or target deduplication systems 160(1)-(N) usingvarious protocols, such as Network File System (NFS), Server MessageBlock (SMB), or Common Internet File System (CIFS). Network 185generally represents any type or form of computer network orarchitecture capable of facilitating communication between sourcededuplication systems 115(1)-(N) and/or target deduplication systems160(1)-(N). In certain embodiments, a communication interface, such ascommunication interface 845 in FIG. 8, may be used to provideconnectivity between source deduplication systems 115(1)-(N) and/ortarget deduplication systems 160(1)-(N), and network 185. It should benoted that the embodiments described and/or illustrated herein are notlimited to the Internet or any particular network-based environment. Forexample, network 185 can be a Storage Area Network (SAN).

In one embodiment, all or a portion of one or more of the disclosedembodiments may be encoded as a computer program and loaded onto andexecuted by the duplication system 910, source deduplication systems115(1)-(N), and/or target deduplication systems 160(1)-(N), or anycombination thereof. All or a portion of one or more of the embodimentsdisclosed herein may also be encoded as a computer program, stored onduplication system 910, source deduplication systems 115(1)-(N), and/ortarget deduplication systems 160(1)-(N), and distributed over network185. In some examples, all or a portion of duplication system 910,source deduplication systems 115(1)-(N), and/or target deduplicationsystems 160(1)-(N) may represent portions of a cloud-computing ornetwork-based environment. Cloud-computing environments may providevarious services and applications via the Internet. These cloud-basedservices (e.g., software as a service, platform as a service,infrastructure as a service, etc.) may be accessible through a webbrowser or other remote interface.

Various functions described herein may be provided through a remotedesktop environment or any other cloud-based computing environment. Inaddition, one or more of the components described herein may transformdata, physical devices, and/or representations of physical devices fromone form to another. For example, duplication system 910, source backupserver 110, and/or target backup server 155 may transform the behaviorof source deduplication systems 115(1)-(N) and/or target deduplicationsystems 160(1)-(N) in order to cause source deduplication systems115(1)-(N) and/or target deduplication systems 160(1)-(N) to performduplication and/or data migration between disparate deduplicationsystems.

Although the present disclosure has been described in connection withseveral embodiments, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to thespecific forms set forth herein. On the contrary, it is intended tocover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as can bereasonably included within the scope of the disclosure as defined by theappended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: in response to adetermination that a fingerprint of a data block does not match any of aplurality of existing source fingerprints, generating a targetfingerprint for data block using a target fingerprint algorithmassociated with a target deduplication system; receiving the targetfingerprint at the target deduplication system, wherein the fingerprintand the plurality of existing source fingerprints were generated at asource deduplication system using a source fingerprint algorithm;determining whether the target fingerprint exists in a targetfingerprint database, wherein the target fingerprint database comprisesa plurality of target fingerprints generated using the targetfingerprint algorithm; and in response to a determination that thetarget fingerprint does not exist in the target fingerprint database,sending a request to the source deduplication system, wherein therequest is a request for the source deduplication system to send thedata block to the target deduplication system.
 2. The method of claim 1,further comprising: receiving a fingerprint translation table at thetarget deduplication system, wherein the fingerprint translation tablecomprises one or more source fingerprints, and one or more targetfingerprints, corresponding to the one or more source fingerprints, theone or more source fingerprints comprise the fingerprint, and the one ormore target fingerprints comprise the target fingerprint.
 3. The methodof claim 2, further comprising: identifying at least one targetfingerprint not in the fingerprint translation table, wherein thefingerprint translation table comprises a plurality of sourcefingerprints, and a plurality of target fingerprints, corresponding tothe plurality of source fingerprints, the plurality of targetfingerprints comprises the at least one target fingerprint, theplurality of source fingerprints comprise the one or more sourcefingerprints, and the plurality of target fingerprints comprise the oneor more target fingerprints.
 4. The method of claim 3, furthercomprising: sending at least one source fingerprint to the sourcededuplication system, wherein the fingerprint translation tableindicates that the at least one source fingerprint corresponds to the atleast one target fingerprint.
 5. The method of claim 3, furthercomprising: identifying one or more data blocks corresponding to the atleast one target fingerprint; generating at least one source fingerprintfor the one or more data blocks using the source fingerprint algorithm;and sending the at least one source fingerprint to the sourcededuplication system.
 6. The method of claim 3, further comprising:sending the at least one target fingerprint to the source deduplicationsystem; and associating the at least one target fingerprint with one ormore data blocks corresponding to the at least one target fingerprint,at the source deduplication system.
 7. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising: receiving a fingerprint translation table at the targetdeduplication system, wherein the fingerprint translation tablecomprises a plurality of target fingerprints; and receiving one or moretarget fingerprints, wherein the one or more target fingerprintscomprise the target fingerprint.
 8. The method of claim 7, whereinidentifying at least one target fingerprint, wherein the at least onetarget fingerprint is identified by virtue of the at least one targetfingerprint not being in the fingerprint translation table.
 9. Themethod of claim 8, wherein the identifying comprises: comparing eachfingerprint of the one or more target fingerprints to each fingerprintof the plurality of target fingerprints, wherein the fingerprinttranslation table further comprises a plurality of source fingerprints,corresponding to the one or more target fingerprints; and in response tothe each fingerprint of the one or more target fingerprints not matchingany of the plurality of target fingerprints, identifying a fingerprintcorresponding to the each fingerprint as the at least one targetfingerprint, using the fingerprint translation table.
 10. The method ofclaim 9, further comprising: sending a request to the sourcededuplication system, wherein the request is a request for at least onedata block corresponding to the at least one target fingerprint.
 11. Astorage device comprising: a non-transitory computer-readable storagemedium, wherein a plurality of instructions are encoded in thenon-transitory computer-readable storage medium; and the plurality ofinstructions, comprising a first set of instructions, executable on acomputer system, configured to receive a target fingerprint from asource deduplication system, wherein the computer system is configuredto implement a target deduplication system, the target fingerprint wasgenerated for a data block, using a target fingerprint algorithmassociated with the target deduplication system, the target fingerprintis received at the target deduplication system as a result of adetermination that a fingerprint of the data block did not match any ofa plurality of existing source fingerprints, and the fingerprint and theplurality of existing source fingerprints were generated using a sourcefingerprint algorithm associated with the source deduplication system, asecond set of instructions, executable on the computer system,configured to determine whether the target fingerprint exists in atarget fingerprint database, wherein the target fingerprint databasecomprises a plurality of target fingerprints, and the targetfingerprints were generated using the target fingerprint algorithm, anda third set of instructions, executable on the computer system,configured to, in response to a determination that the targetfingerprint does not exist in the target fingerprint database, send arequest to the source deduplication system, wherein the request is arequest for the source deduplication system to send the data block tothe target deduplication system.
 12. The storage device of claim 11,wherein the instructions further comprise: a fourth set of instructions,executable on the computer system, configured to receive a fingerprinttranslation table at the target deduplication system, wherein thefingerprint translation table comprises one or more source fingerprints,and one or more target fingerprints, corresponding to the one or moresource fingerprints, the one or more source fingerprints comprise thefingerprint, and the one or more target fingerprints comprise the targetfingerprint.
 13. The storage device of claim 12, wherein theinstructions further comprise: a fifth set of instructions, executableon the computer system, configured to identify at least one targetfingerprint not in the fingerprint translation table, wherein thefingerprint translation table comprises a plurality of sourcefingerprints, and a plurality of target fingerprints, corresponding tothe plurality of source fingerprints, the plurality of targetfingerprints comprises the at least one target fingerprint, theplurality of source fingerprints comprise the one or more sourcefingerprints, and the plurality of target fingerprints comprise the oneor more target fingerprints.
 14. The storage device of claim 13, whereinthe instructions further comprise: a sixth set of instructions,executable on the computer system, configured to send at least onesource fingerprint to the source deduplication system, wherein thefingerprint translation table indicates that the at least one sourcefingerprint corresponds to the at least one target fingerprint.
 15. Thestorage device of claim 13, wherein the instructions further comprise: asixth set of instructions, executable on the computer system, configuredto identify one or more data blocks corresponding to the at least onetarget fingerprint; a seventh set of instructions, executable on thecomputer system, configured to generate at least one source fingerprintfor the one or more data blocks using the source fingerprint algorithm;and an eighth set of instructions, executable on the computer system,configured to send the at least one source fingerprint to the sourcededuplication system.
 16. The storage device of claim 13, wherein theinstructions further comprise: a sixth set of instructions, executableon the computer system, configured to send the at least one targetfingerprint to the source deduplication system; and a seventh set ofinstructions, executable on the computer system, configured to cause theat least one target fingerprint to be associated with one or more datablocks corresponding to the at least one target fingerprint, at thesource deduplication system.
 17. A computer system comprising: one ormore processors; a computer-readable storage medium coupled to the oneor more processors; and a plurality of instructions, encoded in thecomputer-readable storage medium and configured to cause the one or moreprocessors to receive a target fingerprint from a source deduplicationsystem, wherein the computer system is configured to implement a targetdeduplication system, the target fingerprint was generated for a datablock, using a target fingerprint algorithm associated with the targetdeduplication system, the target fingerprint is received at the targetdeduplication system as a result of a determination that a fingerprintof the data block did not match any of a plurality of existing sourcefingerprints, and the fingerprint and the plurality of existing sourcefingerprints were generated using a source fingerprint algorithmassociated with the source deduplication system, determine whether thetarget fingerprint exists in a target fingerprint database, wherein thetarget fingerprint database comprises a plurality of targetfingerprints, and the target fingerprints were generated using thetarget fingerprint algorithm, and in response to a determination thatthe target fingerprint does not exist in the target fingerprintdatabase, send a request to the source deduplication system, wherein therequest is a request for the source deduplication system to send thedata block to the target deduplication system.
 18. The computer systemof claim 17, wherein the plurality of instructions is further configuredto cause the one or more processors to: receive a fingerprinttranslation table at the target deduplication system, wherein thefingerprint translation table comprises one or more source fingerprints,and one or more target fingerprints, corresponding to the one or moresource fingerprints, the one or more source fingerprints comprise thefingerprint, and the one or more target fingerprints comprise the targetfingerprint.
 19. The computer system of claim 18, wherein the pluralityof instructions is further configured to cause the one or moreprocessors to: identify at least one target fingerprint not in thefingerprint translation table, wherein the fingerprint translation tablecomprises a plurality of source fingerprints, and a plurality of targetfingerprints, corresponding to the plurality of source fingerprints, theplurality of target fingerprints comprises the at least one targetfingerprint, the plurality of source fingerprints comprise the one ormore source fingerprints, and the plurality of target fingerprintscomprise the one or more target fingerprints.
 20. The computer system ofclaim 19, wherein the plurality of instructions is further configured tocause the one or more processors to: send at least one sourcefingerprint to the source deduplication system, wherein the fingerprinttranslation table indicates that the at least one source fingerprintcorresponds to the at least one target fingerprint.